The Sanctus is the last
part of the Preface in the Mass, sung in practically every rite by the
people (or choir). It is one of the elements of the liturgy of which we
have the earliest evidence. St. Clement of Rome (d. about 104) mentions
it. He quotes the text in Isaiah 6:3, and goes on to say that it is
also sung in church; this at least seems the plain meaning of the
passage: "for the Scripture says . . . Holy, holy, holy Lord of hosts;
full is every creature of his glory. And we, led by conscience,
gathered together in one place in concord, cry to him continuously as
from one mouth, that we may become sharers in his great and glorious
promises" (1 Corinthians 34:6-7). It seems clear that what the people
cry is the text just quoted. Clement does not say at what moment of the
service the people cry those words; but again we may safely suppose
that it was at the end of what we call the Preface, the place at which
the Sanctus appears in every liturgy, from that of "Apost. Const.",
VIII, on. The next oldest witness is Origen (d. 254). He quotes the
text of Isaias and continues: "The coming of my Jesus is announced,
wherefore the whole earth is full of his glory" (In Isa., hom., I, n.
2). There is nothing to correspond to this in the Prophet. It seems
plainly an allusion to liturgical use and so agrees very well with the
place of the Sanctus. The Anaphora of Sarapion of Thmuis (Egypt,
fourteenth century) gives the Sanctus almost exactly in the form of the
Alexandrine Liturgy (Funk, "Didascalia", Paderborn, 1905, II, 174), but
says nothing about its being sung by the people. From the fourteenth
century we have abundance of testimony for theSanctus in every
liturgical centre. In Egypt St. Athanasius (d. 373) mentions it (Expos
in Ps, cii, P.G. XXVII, 434); at Jerusalem St. Cyril (d. 373) (Catech.
myst., V, 6), and at Antioch St. John Chrysostom (d. 407) alludes to it
(in Ps. cxxxiv, n. 6, P.G., LV, 393). Tertullian (d. about 220) ("de
Oratione", 3) and Victor of Vite (d. 486) ("Hist. persec. Vandal", III,
P.L., LVIII quote it in Africa; Germanus of Paris (d. 576) in Gaul (in
Duchesne, "Origines du Culte", 2d ed., Paris, 1898, p. 204), Isidore of
Seville (d. 636) in Spain (ibid.). The Sanctus is sung by the people in
"Apostolic Constitutions", VIII, XII, 27 (Brightman, "Eastern
Liturgies", 18-19) and so in almost all rites. The scanty state of our
knowledge about the early Roman Mass accounts for the fact that we have
no allusion to the Sanctus till it appears in the first Sacramentaries.
The Leonine and Gelasian books give only the celebrant's part; but
their prefaces lead up to it plainly. The Gregorian Sacramentary gives
the text exactly as we still have it (P.L. LXXVIII, 26). But the
passage quoted from St. Clement and then the use of Africa (always
similar to Rome) leave no doubt that at Rome too the Sanctus is part of
the oldest liturgical tradition. In view of Clement's allusion it is
difficult to understand Abbot Cabrol's theory that the Sanctus is a
later addition to the Mass ("Les Origines liturgiques", Paris, 1906, p.
The connection in which it
occurs in the liturgy is this: in all rites the Eucharistic prayer
(Canon Anaphora) begins with a formal thanksgiving to God for his
benefits, generally enumerated at length (see PREFACE). This first part
of the prayer (our Preface) takes the form of an outline of creation,
of the many graces given to Patriarchs and Prophets in the Old Law and
so to the crowning benefit of our redemption by Christ, to His life and
Passion, to the institution of the Holy Eucharist and the words of
institution, all in the scheme of a thanksgiving for these things (cf.
ib.). Before the prayer comes to the mention of our Lord it always
refers to the angels. In "Apost. Const.", VIII, XII (Brightman, op.
cit., 15-18), they occur twice, at the beginning as being the first
creatures and again at the end of the Old Testament history -- possibly
in connection with the place of Isaias who mentions them. In St.
James's liturgy this part of the Anaphora is much shorter and the
angels are named once only (ibid., p.50); so also in St. Mark they come
only once (pp. 131-32). They are always named at length and with much
solemnity as those who join with us in praising God. So the description
in Isaias, VI, 1-4, must have attracted attention very early as
expressing this angelic praise of God and as summing up (in v. 3) just
the note of the first part of the Anaphora. The Sanctus simply
continues the Preface. It is a quotation of what the angels say. We
thank God with the angels, who say unceasingly: "Holy, holy, holy",
etc. Logically the celebrant could very well himself say or sing the
Sanctus. But, apparently from the beginning of its Christian use (so
already Clem. Rom.), one of the dramatic touches that continually adorn
the liturgy was added here. We too desire to say with the angels:
"Holy, holy, holy"; so when the celebrant comes to the quotation, the
people (or choir) interrupt and themselves sing these words, continuing
his sentence. The interruption is important since it is the chief cause
of the separation of the original first part of the eucharistic prayer
(the Preface) at Rome from the rest and the reason why this first part
is still sung aloud although the continuation is said in a low voice.
The only rite that has no Sanctus is that of the Ethiopic Church Order
(Brightman, op. cit., 190).
II. THE SANCTUS IN THE EASTERN RITES
In the liturgies of St.
James and St. Mark and the Byzantine Rite (Brightman, loc. cit.) the
introductory sentence calls it the "hymn of victory" (ton epinikion
hymnon). This has become its usual name in Greek. It should never be
called the Trisagion, which is a different liturgical formula ("Holy
God, Holy Strong One, Holy Immortal One have mercy on us") occurring in
another part of the service. In "Apost. Const.", VIII, XII, 27, theform
of the Epinikion is: "Holy, holy, holy the Lord of Hosts (sabaoth).
Full (are) the heaven and the earth of his glory. Blessed for ever.
Amen." St. James has: "Holy, holy, holy, Lord (voc.) of hosts. Full
(are) the heaven and the earth of thy Glory. Hosanna (he) in the
highest. Blessed (is) he that comes in the name of the Lord. Hosanna,
(he) in the highest." In this the cry of the people on Palm Sunday
(Matthew 21:9, modified) is added (cf. the Jacobite form, Brightman, p.
86). Alexandria has only the text of Isaias (ib. 132; and Coptic, in
Greek, 176; Abyssinian, p. 231). In the Greek Alexandrine form (St.
Mark) the text occurs twice. First the celebrant quotes it himself as
said by the cherubim and seraphim; then he continues aloud: "for all
things always call thee holy (hagiazei) and with all who call thee holy
receive, Master and Lord, our hallowing (hagiasmon) who with them sing,
saying . . ." and the people repeat the Epinikion (Brightman, p.132).
The Nestorians have a considerably extended form of Is., vi, 3, and
Matt., xxi, 9, in the third person (ib. 284). The Byzantine Rite has
the form of St. James (ib. 323-324), so also the Armenians (p. 436). In
all Eastern rites only the sentence that immediately introduces the
Epinikion is said aloud, as an Ekphonesis.
III. THE SANCTUS IN THE WEST
In Latin it is the
"Tersanctus" or simply the "Sanctus". "Hymnus angelicus" is ambiguous
and should be avoided, since this is the usual name for the Gloria in
Excelsis. Germanus of Paris bears witness to it in the Gallican Rite
(Ep. I; P.L., LXXII, 89 seq.; see above). Its form was as at Rome. The
Mozarabic Sanctus is almost the Roman one; but it has for the first
Hosanna: "Osanna filio David" (more literally Matthew 21:9) and the
additional exclamations "Agyos, agyos, agyos Kyrie o theos" (P.L.,
LXXXV, 548 cfr. 116). Milan has exactly our form. It may be noted that
the Gallican and Mozarabic liturgies, following the tradition of
Antioch and Jerusalem (Brightman, op. cit., pp. 19, 51), continue the
Anaphora by taking up the idea of the Sanctus: "Vere sanctus, vere
benedictus Dominus noster Iesus Christus" (P.L.,LXXXV, 548) and so
coming almost at once to the words of Institution: This prayer, which
varies in each Mass, is called "Post Sanctus", or "Vere Sanctus". Milan
has one remnant of this on Holy Saturday (Duchesne, ib. 205). At Rome
the Sanctus is described in "Ordo Rom.", I, as "hymnus angelicus, id
est Sanctus" (P. L., LXXVIII, 945). It is sung by the regionary
subdeacons (ib.). So also "Ordo Rom.", II, which notes that Hosanna is
sung twice (ib. 974). C. Atchley thinks that this marks the beginning
of the addition of the Benedictus verses to the Sanctus, that
originally these were an acclamation to the celebrating bishop and that
they were only later directed towards the Holy Eucharist. In "Apost.
Connst.", VIII, XIII, 13 (Brightman, 24), these verses are sung at the
Elevation just before Communion, then they were pushed back to become
an appendix to the Sanctus, where they coincide more or less with the
moment of consecration. Mr. Atchley further thinks that the Benedictus
in the Roman Rite is a Gallican addition of the eleventh century ("Ordo
Romanus Primus", London, 1905, pp. 90-5). That the verses of Matthew,
xxi, 9, were first used as a salutation to the bishop is quite probable
(cf. Peregrinatio Silviæ, ed. Gamurrini, 59-60). It is less likely that
they are a late Gallican addition at Rome. Their occurrence in the
liturgy of Jerusalem-Antioch may well be one more example of the
relation between that centre and Rome from the earliest ages (see CANON
OF THE MASS).
We do not know at what
moment the chant of the Sanctus was taken from the subdeacons and given
to the schola cantorum. This is merely part of a general tendency to
entrust music that was getting more ornate and difficult to trained
singers. So the Gradual was once sung by a deacon. The "Ordo Rom. V"
implies that the subdeacons no longer sing the Sanctus (P. L. LXXVIII,
988). In "Ordo XI", 20 (ib. 1033), it is sung by the "Basilicarii". St.
Gregory of Tours (d. 593) says it is sung by the people (de mirac. S.
Martini, II, 14; P.L. LXXI). The notice of the "Liber Pontificalis"
that Pope Sixtus I (119-128) ordered the people to sing the Sanctus
cannot be correct. It seems that it was not sung always at every Mass.
The Second Council of Vaison finds it necessary to command that it
should not be omitted in Lent nor at requiems (Can. 3; Hefele-Leclercq,
"Histoire des Conciles" II, 1114). There were also laws in the Middle
Ages forbidding the celebrant to continue the Canon before the choir
had finished singing it (Martène, "De antiq. eccl, ritibus", I, 4, §7).
The ringing of a bell at the Sanctus is a development from the
Elevation bell; this began in the Middle Ages. Ivo of Chartres (d.
1116) mentions it (Ep. 142) and Durandus (Rationale, IV, 41, §53). It
was rung to call people to church that they might see the Elevation.
The Sanctus bell is an earlier warning that the Canon is about to
begin. The rubrics of the Missal still say nothing about the bell at
the Sanctus. It was (and in places still is) usual to ring the great
church bell, at least at high Mass. The hand-bell was only a warning to
the ringers in the tower (Gavanti-Merati, "Thesaurus S. Rituum", II, 7,
Venice, 1762, p. 156).
The text of the Roman
Sanctus is first, Isa., vi, 3, with 'pleni sunt coeli et terra gloria
tua" instead of "plena est omnis terra gloria eius". In this way (as
atAntioch and Alexandria) it is made into a prayer by the use of the
second person. In all liturgies the Hebrew for "hosts" sabaoth) is
kept, as in the Septuagint (Vulgate, "exercituum"). The "Lord of hosts"
is a very old Semitic title, in the polytheistic religions apparently
for the moon-god, the hosts being the stars (as in Genesis 2:1; Psalm
32:6). To the Jews these hosts were the angels (cf. Lc., II, 13). Then
follows the acclamation of Palm Sunday in Matthew, xxi, 9. It is based
on Ps. cxvii, 25-26; but the source of the liturgical text is, of
course, the text in the Gospel. Hosanna is in the Greek text and
Vulgate, left as a practically untranslatable exclamation of triumph.
It means literally "Oh help", but in Matthew, xxi, 9, it is already a
triumphant interjection (like Alleluia). In "Didache", X, 6, it occurs
as a liturgical formula ("Hosanna to the God of David"). In the
medieval local rites the Sanctus was often "farced" (interpolated with
tropes), like the Kyrie and other texts, to fill up the long musical
neums. Specimens of such farcings, including one attributed to St.
Thomas Aquinas, may be seen in Bona, "Rerum liturgicarum", II, 10, §4
(ed. Paris, 1672), p. 418. The skeleton of a Mass at the blessing of
palms retains not only a Preface but also a Sanctus, sung to the
original "simple" tone. The many other prayers (blessing of the font,
ordinations, etc.) that are modelled on the Preface diverge from its
scheme as they proceed and do not end with a Sanctus.
IV. PRESENT RITE
At high Mass as soon as the
celebrant has sung the last word of the Preface (dicentes) the choir
begins the Sanctus, continuing his phrase. They should sing it straight
through, including the Benedictus. The custom of waiting till after the
Elevation and then adding the Benedictus, once common, is now abolished
by the rubric ("De ritibus servandis in cantu missæ, VII) of the
Vatican Gradual. It was a dramatic effect that never had any warrant.
Sanctus and Benedictus are one text. Meanwhile the deacon and subdeacon
go up to the right and left of the celebrant and say the Sanctus in a
low voice with him. Every one in the choir and church kneels (Cærim.
Episcop., II, VIII, 69). The hand-bell is usually rung at the Sanctus;
but at Rome there is no bell at all at high Mass. While the choir sings
the celebrant goes on with the Canon. They must finish or he must wait
before the Consecration. At low Mass the celebrant after the Preface,
bowing and laying the folded hands on the altar, continues the Sanctus
in a lower voice (vox media). The bell is rung three times. Although
the rubrics of the Missal do not mention this it is done everywhere by
approved custom. It may be noticed that of the many chants of the
Sanctus in the Gradual the simple one only (for ferias of Advent and
Lent, requiems and the blessing of palms) continues the melody of the
Preface and so presumably represents the same musical tradition as our
Preface tone. As in the case of the Preface its mode is doubtful.
Written by Adrian Fortescue. Transcribed by Tony de Melo.
The Catholic Encyclopedia,
Volume XIII. Published 1912. New York: Robert Appleton Company. Nihil
Obstat, February 1, 1912. Remy Lafort, D.D., Censor. Imprimatur. +John
Cardinal Farley, Archbishop of New York
divinorum officiorum, IV, 34; BONA, Rerum liturgiarum libri duo, II, X,
4; BENEDICT XIV, De SS. Sacrificio missæ, II, XI, 18-19;
GAVANTI-MERATI, Thesaurus S. Rituum, II, VII, 80-86; GIHR, Das h.
Messopfer (Freiburg 1897), 524-530.